February 2011
192 posts
Feb 28th
18 notes
Feb 28th
81 notes
Feb 28th
28 notes
Feb 28th
231 notes
Feb 28th
174 notes
Feb 28th
56 notes
Feb 26th
150 notes
Feb 26th
30 notes
Feb 26th
55 notes
Feb 26th
246 notes
Feb 26th
15 notes
Feb 26th
47 notes
Feb 26th
33 notes
Feb 26th
152 notes
Feb 25th
44 notes
Feb 25th
61 notes
Feb 25th
46 notes
Feb 25th
116 notes
pablohonie asked: Do you think Frankenstein will be recorded at some point and put out on a disk, like some Broadway shows?
I live too far away from the nearest showing for anyone to care to drive me, and I want to see it more than anything else in the world.
Feb 25th
Feb 25th
51 notes
poete asked: http://theater.nytimes.com/2011/02/26/theater/reviews/26franken.html?ref=theater
Feb 25th
3 notes
Feb 25th
75 notes
Feb 25th
53 notes
Feb 25th
57 notes
Feb 25th
54 notes
Feb 25th
66 notes
Feb 24th
120 notes
2 tags
The Evening Standard's Frankenstein Review →
Rating: 4/5 ‘Having seen each essay both roles, I’d say Cumberbatch is the more convincing as the science-mad Frankenstein. Both are superb as the Creature.’
Feb 24th
6 notes
2 tags
The Stage's Frankenstein Review →
‘There is real intelligence to the creature under Cumberbatch’s guidance - the philosophical questions are burning within.’
Feb 24th
5 notes
Feb 24th
93 notes
Feb 24th
43 notes
2 tags
Variety's Frankenstein Review →
‘The show’s strength lies with its stars. Benedict Cumberbatch is more hard-edged in both roles.’
Feb 24th
6 notes
2 tags
Bloomberg's Frankenstein Review →
Rating: 3/4 ‘Benedict Cumberbatch (hero of the BBC’s “Sherlock’’ series) and buff film actor Jonny Lee Miller alternate as Frankenstein and The Creature … I saw both, and the palm goes — by a margin — to Cumberbatch.
Feb 24th
8 notes
2 tags
Second Review of Frankenstein from The Times (via... →
This is more of a compare/contrast between the two characters & performers. ‘Cumberbatch is more graceful, girlish almost: but to see this normally suave performer hurling himself into the agile physicality and awkward strangeness of the Creature is revelatory, a quantum leap for his reputation…’
Feb 23rd
19 notes
2 tags
Time Out's Frankenstein Review →
Rating: 4/5 ‘Cumberbatch is camper, funnier and nastier in the monster’s role … And Cumberbatch - as fans of the Beeb’s ‘Sherlock’ will attest - has a sadistic flair when it comes to playing a semi-autistic genius with a chip of ice at his heart.’
Feb 23rd
13 notes
2 tags
The Independent's Frankenstein Review →
Rating: 4/5 ‘Cumberbatch emphasises the intellectual edge of both roles … Cumberbatch is brilliant at conveying the blackly ridiculous aspects of the hubristic Scientist.’
Feb 23rd
9 notes
2 tags
What's On Stage's Frankenstein Review →
Rating: 4/5 ‘Cumberbatch is a superb Victor.’
Feb 23rd
10 notes
2 tags
The Times' Frankenstein Review (via... →
‘Cumberbatch astonished in the monster role…’
Feb 23rd
12 notes
2 tags
The Guardian's Review of Frankenstein. →
Rating 4/5. ‘In performance … Cumberbatch’s Creature is unforgettable… But when it comes to Frankenstein, I felt Cumberbatch had the edge.’
Feb 23rd
31 notes
2 tags
The Telegraph's review of Frankenstein. →
Rating 4/5. ‘I can report that both versions are well worth seeing…Cumberbatch undoubtedly has the edge as the scientist.’
Feb 23rd
10 notes
Feb 23rd
88 notes
Feb 23rd
140 notes
Feb 23rd
310 notes
Feb 23rd
75 notes
Feb 23rd
146 notes
Feb 23rd
211 notes
Feb 23rd
65 notes
Feb 23rd
236 notes
Feb 23rd
26 notes
Feb 23rd
63 notes